this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
86 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House Office of Management and Budget on Thursday began its initial communications to agencies on how to prepare for a possible government shutdown, a source familiar with the plans said, as lawmakers on Capitol Hill have yet to settle on a plan to avoid a shutdown by November 17.

The communications are part of the standard procedure laying out the steps toward bringing non-essential government functions to a halt.

“One week prior to the expiration of appropriations bills, regardless of whether the enactment of appropriations appears imminent, OMB will communicate with agency senior officials to remind agencies of their responsibilities to review and update orderly shutdown plans, and will share a draft communication template to notify employees of the status of appropriations,” a budget circular document from the Office of Management and Budget states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fucking hell. The worst part is that it is looking more and more like they're just going to let it happen, and Republicans will (likely successfully) blame Biden for their own inability to not stan christofascism for two seconds.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They aren't going to be able to hang this on Biden. Everyone can see how fucked up the GOP is.

No, I think the worst part is that I don't believe there is any end in sight. I could seriously imagine a scenario where the House is completely non-functional until the next fucking election. I'm not sure what that looks like, but I also can't imagine them being able to compromise - it's just when and if either side blinks.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone can see how fucked up the GOP is.

I wish it was that simple, but even if that latest poll from NYT that shows Trump ahead in key battleground states winds up being wrong, it at least indicates that too many people still don't see how fucked up the GOP is. It should not be at all close, at this point.

The general public is clearly still painfully stupid and uninformed, and I hope that volunteer grassroots efforts can overcome it enough next year to avoid fascism.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no end, it will become exponentially worse as the years go by. This is politics now and forever.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not talking just "politics is a disaster." I'm talking about a House that is literally paralyzed and can't pass or approve a single thing. That would certainly end in the next election, but is it even possible for a shutdown to go that long? I have to assume not but I don't know how this gets resolved.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Its unprecedented, right? At least in the USA. We just don't know what would happen, but its definitely not going to be good. The question is would the damage done be enough to send our country into death throws?

[–] noride@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Shutdowns are a loser for Republicans... Per.. Republicans?

Source