this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
29 points (96.8% liked)

Australian News

551 readers
53 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blowing a tire is unlikely to cause this level of loss of control at residential speeds. It also wouldn't make the car speed up and the driver could hit the brakes.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe we are in agreement. "super low odds" and "unlikely" mean the same thing. But those odds are not zero - which was my point. It was also an example, you can substitute that example with heart attack/sneezing fit/swerving for an animal/whatever takes your fancy. Roads are a dangerous place.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Roads can be a dangerous place, but beer gardens shouldn't be.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No arguments with that. But the question posed wasn't "should beer gardens be located on the side of a road with no bollards?", rather 'should diabetics be allowed to drive?'.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's clear this particular diabetic wasn't managing their condition.