this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
46 points (94.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
720 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
46
Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IsThisLemmyOpen@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

Deleted

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ahbi_santini@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an IP attorney I support what I call "The Founder's Copyright"

  • 15 year term, plus and additional 15 is you re-register.
  • mandatory registration. None of this auto-registration
  • mandatory copyright notice (Copyright (c) 2023)
  • no moral rights
  • no retroactive copyright extensions (should have been unConstitutional, bad SCOTUS specifically Ginsburg who wrote that opinion)
  • recognition in the law that computers and the internet work by copying. This blanket prohibition on copying causes judges to make workable exceptions and intentional ignore the ludacris parts of the law.
  • as a bonus, I think you should be required to give 2 full copies of whatever you register for archiving.

If they roll back copyright law to the state it was in in 1830, I'd support it again.