this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
6 points (68.8% liked)

Leftism

2107 readers
105 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Power of Land: Georgism 101

https://youtu.be/smi_iIoKybg

Discusses importance of common ownership of land and natural resources

@leftism

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jlou@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I meant to ensure socially efficient usage. Not usage that is efficient from the perspective of a private actor. These are not the same thing in many cases, but in particular, it is the case with land due to inelastic supply

Land value tax is associated with Georgism. I don't see what the point would be of denying that or trying to avoid association with Georgism

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In both cases, oversight is not contingent on some formalized rule of value transfer.

It is always possible to review the current circumstances, and simply to make a suitable decision.