this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
140 points (96.1% liked)

UKCasual

6073 readers
2 users here now

A friendly place to chat.

No politics please. Don't be a dick.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He'd basically be dissolving his own position at that point right?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Presumably it'd mean either the end of the monarchy or the end of the government as we know it, so it's a win-win for us lol

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yes. But why remain as an impotent king?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I mean he's 70-odd and has basically been powerless his whole life, if the options are to rock the boat or kick the can down the road and live out his last decade or two doing bugger-all in unimaginable opulence, I can see why he'd pick the latter.

Like it's not necessarily the morally right option, but I get it.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, I can understand that, but he's been a lead voice on the environment a lot longer than most. I guess he's swapped his beliefs & scruples for the trappings of monarchy, and that diminishes him rather than elivates him in my eyes.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You expected him to be making political statements as the monarch?

The only reason the monarchy still exists is because the head of it remains apolitical.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess I had some inchoate expectation that he'd be more influential. Sunak's just turned him into a hypocrite.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I generally don't want some bloke who is only there through accident of birth to have any influence on policy.

Who voted for him to have influence?

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd support constitutional reform.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And that's the least bad thing Sunak has done this week!

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The monarch has been technically impotent since Elizabeth II took over.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been politically/constitutionally impotent since a long time before that. But I get your point.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's true, but I was thinking of things like Edward VIII and his friendship with Hitler.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They may not have direct power, but with their wealth and land ownership they're definitely pulling strings behind the scenes.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Liz used to have a weekly meeting with the PM every Thursday, I suspect Chaz does too. I'm guessing they don't just talk about the weather and the cricket

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

"So... how are things?"