this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
388 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
187 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive Link from archive.today

Original link from Wired

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyd@vlemmy.net 20 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Given TikTok's precarious situation, it's no surprise they're going out of their way to bend to the whims of US politics. Face it, there are a lot of Republicans ready to justify banning TikTok by pointing to teenagers getting abortion advice from the platform.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (22 children)

There are plenty of other reasons to ban TikTok, namely the massive and unchecked data collection by the Chinese government.

I'd prefer not to install Chinese spyware, thankyouverymuch.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (14 children)

It is not the chinese government you should be worried about, my friend.

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The chinese government neither wants to sell you shit, nor will harrass you with their cops (unless you live in China).

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not more naive than trusting the US government. That one has a more direct control and interest in implementing a surveillance police-state.

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, it absolutely is, because the US government does not require companies by law to hand over any and all information they collect to them.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Forgot about the NSA leaks already? They don't ask for the data.

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The NSA collects all kinds of information. That is an absolute pittance compared to the amount of data collected when it is required by law...

Like this is not that complicated.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ByteDance is still incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Not the PRC.

Edit: You still haven't explained why the PRG has more of an incentive to spy on you personally than the NS government does.

Of course: China spies on the US. But as long as you're not carrying government secrets, you're a way more interesting target for the people in charge of the cops.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago
  1. They might not need to, since the NSA has quite an arsenal of tools.
  2. The companies might share all the info volutarily.
  3. They'll definetly share the data if the price is right.

Google Amazon and Facebook have repeatedly worked with law enforcement in the past. You can still believe that the chinese goverment is sooo much worse than the US, but don't call other people naive if you do.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)