this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16690 readers
607 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
2
Developer claims Steam is rejecting games with AI-generated artwork (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by AstronautOlympian@partizle.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qtie314@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For clarification, they are only rejecting games with AI-generated content trained with datasets not owned by the creator. If a game uses AI trained in content owned by its company, it's fair game.

[–] somePotato@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds worse than a complete AI art ban. If you're an amateur dev with an idea, some programming skill and zero budget, you can't use AI art to make your game look a little better than all the crappy asset flips. But if you're a big studio with a portfolio to train the AI on, you can cut 90% of your art team to use mostly AI. Indie devs lose, artists lose and big corps win, as usual

[–] brsrklf@compuverse.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I think you're underestimating how huge a dataset has to be to get a somehow decent AI output.

The effort to create those custom in-house datasets would never be worth the prospect of not needing artists anymore. There is a reason current AI is mostly trained with sources of dubious legitimity. They just need as much data as they can gather.

AI generation is only profitable if you conveniently ignore where your source material comes from.