this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7200 readers
380 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Someone bought a century home in Saint John and is allowing it to rot. The buyer apparently lives in Toronto and doesn't care that the building is falling apart.

This is shitty. Someone has the money for "an investment", which means other people don't get somewhere to live.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is no landlord. This property is empty. Nobody is living there.

[–] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Took awhile to interpret what you meant here. I guess I never thought about it but by definition the noun landlord is tied up in some capacity with tenants paying a rent.

Intuitively, landlord sounds really simple. Lord being a ruler of a household and land in this context being a territory marked by political boundaries i.e 'someone's yard', you'd think they'd mash up easily to become 'Ruler of the house on the land' i.e landlord, but it's entirely more than that. In all definitions I've found it's tied into tenancy.

Kinda weird and I don't like it.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I meant it more collequially and was including real estate investors squatting on land in the same category since it doesn't really roll off the tongue