Programming

17398 readers

105 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

140

Which language you wish would really grow and reach mainstream adoption? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by ICastFist@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

144 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Assume mainstream adoption as used by around 7% of all github projects

Personally, I'd like to see Nim get that growth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find Universal Function Call Syntax a much nicer solution than pipes, although I don't think it's quite as broad.

For example, taking the example from elixir's home page:

"Elixir" |> String.graphemes() |> Enum.frequencies()

would be

"Elixir".graphemes.frequences

in something like D

[–] Oinks@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally find that syntax a bit confusing because it looks like it's traversing members of structs/records/objects. It also looks like the composition operator in Haskell but is read in opposite order.

I'm sure it's perfectly fine when actually working in D but it's not as obvious as pipes imo.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You can add parenthesis if you prefer