this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
303 points (87.0% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
4014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago (38 children)

xkcd still has the best approach to this; four random common words

[–] vamputer@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like doing entire phrases with some rhymes thrown in. Makes it easier to remember them.

"BonyTonyMoansHe'sOnlyGrownLonely" has a shitload of characters, and a full sentence (even a nonsensical one like that) is more memorable to me than a random handful of disparate words.

The more ridiculous, the better. (And, naturally, don't forget your numbers and symbols)

EDIT: Actually, no idea why I made it all one group of words. So long as spaces are in the password's character space (and they very well should be if friggin' emojis are), there's nothing stopping you from doing an entire, punctuated sentence- other than that we've been conditioned not to think of a password that way.

"Skinny Kenny's friend, Mini Ben, has 20 chins." That should be a fully-acceptable password with 46 characters (48 if you add the quotes), capital letters, numbers, and special characters.

[–] scinde@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can't compare a 46 random character password to a password composed out of words, the entropy of each is very different. Your kind of password is vulnerable to dictionary attacks which are way more common and easy than brute forcing every possibility. A 50+ characters unique random password for each service that is stored in a password manager which is encrypted with a 20+ characters random password is the most secure and future proof (for now).

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If the attacker doesn’t know that you’re using a dictionary password, then dictionary attacks probably won’t be their first choice. I want to remember these passwords across devices and on guests.

[–] scinde@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Like someone else said on this thread; that's just security by obscurity, which is bad. Dictionary attacks will be one of the first (brute force related) attacks attackers will use because word passwords are incredibly popular (though admittedly of fewer words: VeryBigDog34 etc..), and relatively easy to do. I agree that having the password across different devices is somewhat of a challenge with a password manager, but not impossible. My very long and complex password is all down to muscle memory by this point, I couldn't tell you what it is from memory.

Also you shouldn't use the same password on multiple things and if you don't use a password manager you will need to memorize a lot of different passwords.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dictionary attacks aren’t some magic bullet. There are a lot of english words and just four of them IS comparable in cracking difficult to a standard 8-char password that is as random as you can make it. There are a lot more words than there are symbols. Four words is obviously not as good as 46 totally random chars

[–] scinde@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Dictionary attacks are definitely not a magic bullet, they require a lot of processing power, just like any other brute-force attack, but not more because of their longer length, as has been implied.

True, there are a lot of english words, but the amount of common words is relatively small. Most people aren't going to choose a password like "MachicolationRemonstranceCircumambulationSchadenfreude", even if it were generated for them (which is unlikely).

Sure, it is comparable to a standard 8 characters passward, but even that kind of password is verging on the insecure (it is the absolute minimum, which should be avoided when possible).

There are also a lot of symbols when you count emojies and the entire Unicode standard.

load more comments (36 replies)