politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Yup. And they're still obsessed with it.
That sure is somethin'.
There are a lot of really stupid people out there.
I watched an interview between a couple of psychologists, where it was pointed out that 16% of the population in the US (and elsewhere, but they were talking specifically about the US) has an IQ below 85. The video was about what someome scoring 85 is capable of, and it isn't a lot. That's smart enough that one can more or less function in society, but they're functionally illiterate, and basically unable to understand or follow instructions of any kind. But they can register to vote.
16% seems like a significant percentage. And easy to target.
Any idea what the video was called? I'd like to watch it
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-kVFYzmigx0
Its an interview with someone named Jordan Peterson who is a canadian psychologist. I don't know much about this person, so I'm sure someone will come along and tell me about some 20+ year old scandal involving them.
More like Jordan Peterson has been a right-wing nut job consistently for 20 years. His entire philosophy for how human society should be run is based on the psychology/anatomy of lobsters. Source There's much more wrong with him though. He's gotten way worse after he had a medically induced coma done in Russia as a form of addiction treatment.
This Video by Veritasium starting at 20:00 explains why it's very ineffective to use IQ as a standard for intelligence. The rest of the video is great though.
Am I suposed to research every person whos name I encounter just to make sure they didnt do some "bad thing" 20 years ago? I left a disclaimer in my comment stating I don't really know who this is, and someone is still here like clockwork caterwauling and crying about someone I don't know anything about. Get a life.
I wasn't saying shit about you or your comment. I just meant to inform you on both Peterson and IQ.
It really irritates me that people downvoted you for sharing information. People have mixed feels about Jordan Peterson. There are things about him I personally dislike (he rambles... a lot) and some of his views are outright wrong but that doesn't mean he hasn't helped people, or that he doesn't make good points
People are so black and white in their thinking. The rigidity frustrates me. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to share. I appreciate it
Edit: I watched both the video suggested and the Veritasium video. The latter was significantly more informative and interesting. Peterson did that thing that he does where he rambled a lot, though the paper folding story is interesting
It's annoying that I have to apparently research every person in every bit of media before I watch it. Some people get so worked up by this and ignore a lot of actually important info as a result.
I just assume anyone whining and downvoting is one of the 16%.
I agree. Simply watching a single video that someone controversial posted should not make a person guilty by association!
Lemmings (and redditors) often seem to be all or nothing and I find that disappointing