this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
118 points (96.8% liked)

Antiwork

8283 readers
2 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
mossy@lemmy.ml
118
(www.businesstoday.in)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

See, I wouldn't be so against this if there were a real promise behind it aside from some "atta-girl"s and "atta-boy"s. Salaried employees aren't going to make an extra 100% for double work. I probably wouldn't be half as productive, on top of gaining a disdain for life.

I can see right through Shah's and other CEO's plans: Normalize slaving yourself to your job just so that we can pay you the same or less in real terms.