this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)
Games
16745 readers
956 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You‘re a rate breed in this sub. Someone who actually sees what is happening.
But in other words: there should be gaming reviewers that check for any kind of on top cost (that is not an additional expansion imo) and divide games in easy to distinguish categories (green and red for example). Green is without money making schemes.
That way you can just check out the games without these mechanics if you like, like I would.
Unfortunately, even that wouldn't be reliable information, because several major games have added this crap in after launch. Sometimes immediately. Sometimes after a few weeks on sale.
Even if clear warnings were accurate, I worry they'd just encourage the thought-terminating cliche of "just don't buy it." I'm already not-buying it as hard as I can. It's still spreading. Fools think that proves it's what consumers want, when obviously it's so profitable that boycotts can't work.
Only legislation can fix this.
You are 100% correct. The same is correct for social media and there are studies that indicate that social media is „trapping“ people through their mechanics, dark patterns and peer pressure.
I‘m still baffled that some people (on lemmy!) are not able to understand why big corpos=bad.
Even fucking Mastodon implemented infinite scrolling. Shoved that right in there when Twitter caught fire - if there's an option to go back to what I signed up for, I have not found it.
What's so bad about infinite scrolling pages?
It's an antipattern. It prevents you from segmenting your time on a site, so you're more likely to just keep going, never recognizing it's been hours.
It's also dogshit for usability. Are you trying to catch up on some artist's comic? Have fun holding Page Down for half an hour. Hope the site doesn't reload whenever it feels like it.
Now I gotta ask: is that not how it was? I haven’t been a big twitter user ever.
It used to be cleanly paginated like mobile Twitter... back when mobile Twitter existed. You'd get 20 or 40 posts in a row, and then a Next link. Which I think was based on timestamps instead of being /page/2 nonsense, so reloading a tab would actually put you where you left off, instead of some arbitrary distance behind the eternal present.
Okay! That makes sense. I can see how this both improves the using experience for some but also makes it more addictive.