Personal Finance

3819 readers

1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WandererLagomorph799@lemmy.ml

nieceandtows@programming.dev

nieceandtows@lemmy.ml

Your ‘Set It and Forget It’ 401(k) Made You Rich. No More. — WSJ (apple.news)

submitted 1 year ago by Valdair@kbin.social to c/personalfinance@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For four decades, patient savers able to grit their teeth through bubbles, crashes and geopolitical upheaval won the money game. But the formula of building a nest egg by rebalancing a standard mix of stocks and bonds isn’t going to work nearly as well as it has.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] centof@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone always quotes the growth of the S&P500, but isn’t pretty much no one 100% invested for their entire retirement in the S&P500?

Why does it matter if no one else does it? Investing is not a social experience. Most people don't do it because they are uninformed and ignorant about how to manage their money. The easy option is the easy option because you someone else can get more of a cut of your money. You generally pick up to two of these three with any product: good, easy, cheap. The promoted target date funds are usually just easy. They have high expense ratios and are therefore not good or cheap.

[–] Valdair@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't think an expense ratio of 0.08% was considered high?