politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'd agree that it's an outlier but I don't think it's cherry picked.
Sorry I missed that but sisko would have to go back in time first. LLAP
If you want a violent left what keeps you from being violent?
Because he’s a massive pussy
I don't think that's constructive
My point isn't that it's wide spread
Your point is that even when there is massive evidence of rising white nationalist right wing violence, you feel the need to equivocate to ensure that everyone is as scared of left wingers as right wingers (despite the evidence showing the right wing engages in undeniably much more violence), because you are a centrist who thinks everyone should be as lame as you are.
Well I am lame but I don't think everyone should be the same as me. I don't think everyone should be as scared of left-wingers as much as right-wingers. My point is that the willingness to accept political violence is rising across the political spectrum. There are a lot of people who are frustrated and angry and the future is an unknown.
My point is that the willingness to use violence is increasing across the board. Republicans are the majority but independents and liberals are more willing to accept political violence and there's no telling how that might end
If political violence has been rising across the board, why use an article from five years ago? According to your premise, shouldn’t there be a more recent incident?
Of course nothing is 100%, but ascribing equal weight between 1% and 99% is a false equivalence.
I long for the days when this didn't require explanation.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/25/support-us-political-violence-prri-brookings-survey
The acceptance of political violence has risen among independents and Democrats. Republicans are much more likely to support violence but the numbers have risen across the border. This isn't a both sides are equal thing for me it's that there could be sometime important happening in the minds of Americans in general.
What's happening is we'd like someone in authority to start doing something about the fascists.
What would you like to see?
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/25/support-us-political-violence-prri-brookings-survey
Republicans are much more likely to support violence but that support has increased among independents and Democrats
Support is not action.
A very important distinction
Hopefully it ends with a giant pile of dead fascists.
How do you define fascist?
You are just asking questions, we get it.
A more productive conversation starter is you telling them what you think a fascist is and asking if they feel the same.
A overview of fascism is here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Fascism and pro Nazi sentiment was very high going into ww2 in the US but government and popular media campaigns forced it underground. It was still out there, though, and is experiencing a ressurgence.
Some people find this concerning.
The word fascist gets used so much I like to try to get an idea where someone stands. For example what's the difference between a fascist and an ultranationalist? Is there one? There are economic components to some fascist countries but not others. Italian fascists stressed creating a fundamentally new society. Other fascist countries didn't stress that (Franco for example). Does a party have to have single party rule? Fascist Italy and Germany had as a cornerstone territorial expansion. Is that necessary to be authentically fascist?
This will lead to a conversation.
I find people typically mean "racist who wants to use individual or institutional force to create a white, Christian government that eliminates or marginalized racial, cultural, and sexual minorities". Or whatever.
The left loves violence and has almost exclusively perpetuated for the last 5 years. The only reason why the retards on this forum are crying about the right is because the media and all forums are left sided.
I'd have to see some data to support the claim that the left "almost exclusively perpetuated [violence] for the last 5 years"
None of that rings true to me.
Yes, that's why trying to get Congress members to support a ceasefire in Gaza has consisted of sitins and trying to get them to vote for a far right speaker of the house consisted of death threats. Shut the fuck up.