this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
116 points (99.2% liked)

Ukraine

8242 readers
471 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] elouboub@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Russia probably can't compete with the whole world arming one country. either Russia will run out of money or Ukraine out of people. I'm betting on Russia out of money.

[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially with how conservative Ukraine is being with it's troops and it's counter attacks. There have been a number of reports of their tactics being based around attriting the Russians while keeping their own troops alive.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Russians are almost certainly dying faster, but they need like 4:1 K/D ratio for victory to be guaranteed.

[–] mihies@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While west is arming Ukraine, they are doing it half-assed. Usually sending them old weapons, in batches and slowly. Why wait months for sending them ATACMS?

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Agreed. Dunno wtf they are waiting for.

[–] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I could guess a couple of reasons - one: perpetual war and destabilized Europe is better for (mostly US) business, two: too powerful Ukraine might scare Russia too much and possibility of (nuclear) escalation is higher.