this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
595 points (98.5% liked)

memes

10296 readers
2302 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KeBaBeeN@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah I agree, they couldve chosen to build it somewhere not so warm ๐Ÿ˜Š

[โ€“] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People lived in hot deserts without AC or melting their skin off for thousands of years.

You maximize shade, maximize plant cover, maximize wind carrying away heat, maximize heat being reflected or radiated away. That means you implement passive cooling techniques like wind catchers or qanats, build narrow streets to shade the ground, make everything brightly colored, you have as many trees as possible, open waters for evaporative cooling etc..

You can do that in modern times too, look at Masdar city. US city planning is just completeley backwards. You can't plop the same city that "works" in a temperate climate and expect it to work in a desert.

Asphalt heats up way beyond ambient temperature, and trees generate their own microclimate with over a dozen degrees lower air temperature, not to speak of shade. So yes, this absolutely is a consequence of car-centric city planning and our grand quest to turn the world into a parking lot

[โ€“] PlushySD@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Or they could've designed the city to catch the chill breeze more, damn those city planner