this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 1 year ago
 

And got a straightforward no as a response XD

Kbin link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kaladininskyrim@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Not sure if turning down an invitation to discuss is a good thing. You can always say no to the proposals after you have listened to them. Participate in discussions, but don't co-operate with them.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's zero chance anything good would come out of this meeting anyway, and they wouldn't be able to talk about it due to NDAs, so why bother?

Meta chose to make it a closed meeting, not the dev.

[–] CorInABox@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps the problem was that it was not an open discussion, but an "off-the-records", private one. And, from a moral standpoint, small concessions can end up leading to a slippery slope.

[–] kjr@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

@CorInABox
No perhaps. That was all the problem. It was a break of trust by the admins who attended this meeting, and then cannot do a lot to regain the trust since they cannot speak about the subject. Eben is unknown who attended meeting.
@LollerCorleone @kaladininskyrim

[–] crystalcorvid@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I don't have a problem with admins having discussions with Meta. I have a problem with those discussions being off the record or under NDA. We thrive on transparency. The secrecy is the problem.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I understand your point and was inclined to agree, up until it said off the record and confidential. Ohhhhhh, so THEIR privacy is important? They can kindly kick rocks and figure it out themselves, especially for free.