this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2022
18 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34862 readers
27 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new restriction applies to all companies that are subject to China’s national security law, which forces firms to co-operate with Beijing’s security networks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PP44@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Great news for them ! It's a great start ! Now let's do the same for US surveillance !

[–] ailiphilia@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes. I'd be happy if history teaches me wrong, but somehow I feel they won't do it.

[–] PP44@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Of course. Tbh, US imperialism made it more difficult to get rid of their surveillance than China's one (at least in western countries). And Europe have a lot of trouble acting politically, and I think it is mostly because they are so liberal. Even more so than the US, that limit liberalism to the thing where it is an advantage to them, but are very protective and prostate control when it benefits their political objectives.

I have to admit that Europe is not 100% passive, and some regulations do try to limit US dominance on Europe, but it is very far from being enough, or even close to what could be done with a real political will.