this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
35 points (92.7% liked)

United Kingdom

4041 readers
153 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Landlords can currently deny tenants who want pets, and some have charged “pet rent”.

Well, it does bring extra issues for the landlord, so I suppose that having a pet fee is reasonable, but it sounds like there's a fair argument that the demand is undersupplied today.

This is for the US, but I wouldn't be surprised if numbers hold.

https://www.tenantcloud.com/blog/pets-in-rental-properties-a-guide-for-landlords-and-tenants

After surveying 1,000 tenants, it was found that approximately 90% of renters have pets. On the other hand, around 69% of landlords do not allow pets in their rental properties due to concerns about potential pet-related issues such as odor, property damage, lack of training, noise complaints, and the property's suitability for pets. In a competitive rental market, landlords may choose not to risk losing potential tenants who don't have pets. One solution to this issue could be for renters with pets to pay an increased deposit to cover possible damages. However, around 88% of pet owners have never had any complaints or caused any damage to rental properties.

Let's take a closer look at some of the pros and cons of renting to pet owners to better understand the implications of such a decision.

Pros:

  1. Increased Demand: Allowing pets in your rental property can open up your pool of potential tenants, as many pet owners struggle to find pet-friendly housing.

  2. Higher Rent: Pet owners are often willing to pay a higher rent or a pet deposit, which can increase your rental income.

  3. Longer Tenancy: Pet owners tend to be more settled and stay in one place for longer periods, which can reduce tenant turnover and vacancy rates.

  4. Responsible Tenants: Pet owners are often trustworthy and caring and most likely will treat your property with respect and care.

  5. Emotional Support: For some tenants, having a pet can be a source of emotional support and can aid mental health issues.

Cons:

  1. Property Damage: Pets can cause significant damage to a rental property, including scratches, stains, and odors, which can be costly to repair.

  2. Noise Complaints: Barking dogs and meowing cats can be a source of disturbance to other tenants and can lead to noise complaints.

  3. Liability Issues: If a tenant's pet injures someone or causes damage to someone else's property, you as the landlord may be held liable.

  4. Cleaning Costs: Even well-behaved pets can shed hair and dander, which can require additional cleaning and maintenance between tenants.

  5. Lease Violations: Some tenants may try to sneak in a pet without your permission, which can lead to lease violations and legal issues.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

it sounds like there’s a fair argument that the demand is undersupplied today.

This is the only argument in my mind. The supply of housing is far too restricted. This is allowing landlords to gouge. If government really worked for the people, then it would have done something about this years ago.