this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

4 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

So let me start off by saying that I recognize that there was initially a genuine problem with people who didn't want NSFW content being exposed to it.

Some of this was due to the fact that not all content was being correctly flagged as NSFW, and some of it was because a lot of users didn't realize that individual users can choose to completely block an entire instance - which is not only a very easy and fast solution, but also does not require an all-or-nothing approach of defederating from NSFW instances.

A number of changes were made, but some of those lingering changes have meant that people who do want to see NSFW content are not because:

  1. Even having subscribed to several NSFW subs, they are effectively completely missing from my feed.

  2. Most NSFW thumbnails are blurred.

Both of these behaviors should not be occurring if a user has chosen in their settings to NOT hide NSFW content.

However, I will also say that the blurred state is something that deserves its own user setting (i.e. so that a user can choose to NOT hide NSFW, but still want them blurred or not) - preferably with the granularity to set it for various sub-types of NSFW (e.g. porn, gore, etc...).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dedale@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't get your reasoning. There's no downside to letting users choose.

And I find the 'love it or leave it' approach distasteful.
I generally like what the admin is doing, in large part because he listens to user feedback, which I was providing.
Of course you're entitled to your opinion.

edit: wait it does makes sense in a way to avoid hosting illegal content, if the instance doesn't have the manpower to moderate effectively. nevermind. still think those issues should be discussed collectively.

[–] Daydreamy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should become accustomed to having multiple accounts, ones for different instances, because this is the fediverse and essentially just semi-interlinked forums. If you want forum specific content that is generally considered spicy, go to that forum directly rather than complain that every other forum not handle your need for spicy content in an effective way for all parties.

This isnt some faceless megacorp. You are so used to one source for all your content due to reddit, but you should not expect one instance to provide you with all your desired content. Can you imagine how many man hours need to be put into effectively handling spicy content, across all instances? Or, you can just go to the spicy content forums.

Yes, there is a need for better handling multiple accounts seamlessly, its definitely under development in several apps. In the meantime it's just something to deal with.

[–] dedale@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Personally I'm very happy with no porn and gore. But I think loss of user agency is what made internet the hell it is now, and alternatives should keep it in mind.
Peertube does have some basic granularity: allow sensitive content or not, blur sensitive thumbnails or not.
It's work no doubt, but I doubt it's the Herculean task some make it out to be.
In the end it's for Ernest to decide, I see no problem in making suggestions one way the other. And I don't understand why you would.

For what it's worth, I haven't browsed reddit in years except for specific technical stuff, you may be assuming a little bit too much based on a single comment.

edit: thinking about it a little more, one case where I'd advocate banning sensitive content entirely is if it is used as a vector of attack against the instance, by posting illegal, or repulsive content to drive traffic away.

[–] gme@bofh.social 9 points 1 year ago

@dedale@kbin.social @Daydreamy@beehaw.org @ShadowRunner@kbin.social @Hillock@kbin.social @Kichae@kbin.social

The Internet wouldn't be what it is today were it not for porn.

Porn gave us VHS.

Porn gave us Laser Discs.

Porn gave us DVDs.

Porn gave us BluRay.

Porn gave us the Internet.

Porn gave us Internet Video.

Porn gave us Streaming Video.

Porn gave us Usenet.

Porn gave us IRC.

Porn gave us Reddit.

Porn gave us the Fediverse.

Where there is technology, there is porn.

[–] ShadowRunner@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

If you want forum specific content that is generally considered spicy, go to that forum directly rather than complain that every other forum not handle your need for spicy content in an effective way for all parties.

This has nothing to do with complaining about how other forums handle this.

This is about how kbin handles it, and kbin is designed to incorporate multiple forums from multiple instances. In other words, we're talking about how kbin should be able to do what it's designed to do even better.

[–] bitwise@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The downside is investing tons of time making and testing code that ultimately accomplishes nothing that wouldn't also be achieved by making your own instance.

[–] dedale@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Except here it's not about writing a new functionality as much as getting the UI to do what it says it does.