this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
82 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've never understood the argument that more taxes will drive away foreign businesses. Say a big multinational is making $4b profit from the Australian market (even if it's shifted overseas and so not 'profit' on paper), and they would have to start paying $2b more tax following a reform. Sure, their profit would be cut in half, investors would be unhappy. But would they really say, "well it's not worth making the remaining $2b profit" and pull out?

[–] min0nim@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly, it’s absolute bullshit to think they won’t stay. I’d hazard a guess that this isn’t the argument they make to governments through lobbying.

It’s probably more along the lines of “we’d have to layoff staff, oh, just before the next election”.

And there’s definitely a number of them that would do just that.

[–] billstickers@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I’ll preface with I fall more towards your view. But the following is the economic orthodoxy view.

I’ll give an example in property terms because it’s high capital and we’re all familiar with it these days. I’m using a simplified example for simplicity. Real businesses will be a lot more marginal difference.

10 years ago you bought a house with cash for $500k. Today the house is worth $1M. Your profit is $50k (5% yield) per year on rent after costs. The government decides to double your tax rate. Next year you’ll only profit $25k. You decide to sell and and buy somewhere else with lower tax. As long as you can sell for more than $500k (25k at 5% yield and the old tax rate in the new location) you’ll make more money by moving.

Similar logic would work in low capital industries where you can stop selling here and start selling in a new market that has a lower tax rate where you didn’t sell before or didn’t sell as much. Even if it’s a poorer market. As long as you sell your product for more than half the taxable profit your net positive.