this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
458 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4347 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 266 points 11 months ago (84 children)

Blows my mind that anyone still uses WinRAR when 7zip exists.

[–] JewGoblin@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

doesn't WinRAR do certain things that 7zip doesn't?

I can't think of what 7zip lacks, but I know it does lack some features

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The reason WinRAR was useful to me allllllll those years ago was for one thing and one thing only: You could split an archive into chunks. So mostly I found that it was good for getting my warez in 1.44MB chunks.

[–] PoliteGhost@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes. That splitting files was especially useful because emails used to have attachment size limits.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No no no no

It was primarily used to post to USENET.

Back in the day, every byte of data was precious and bandwidth was insanely limited, nobody would ever email an attachment for that.

Due to some of the technical details about how email works, that would end up just bloating the file size and it would be the literally most inefficient way possible to send large blobs of data.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (80 replies)