this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
303 points (95.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32512 readers
699 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Single letter variables, yes. Reusing them? No.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if they are well-known in the language you’re using or domain you’re writing for. x and y are fine for coordinates. i and j are fine for loop indices. But abbreviating things unnecessarily is bad IMO. s = GetSession() is too terse, for example.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

No, I mean single-letter vars are standard in physics and math, but reusing vars is not acceptable. Obviously they're not good practice except in the scenarios you describe, but mathies gonna math.

[–] vsh@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Naming variables by single letters is faster than a full 10-15 character word. Also sometimes more readable depending on context.

[–] Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Length might have mattered in the 80s and 90s when IDEs were crap but we got autocomplete in pretty much all our text editors (even TUI ones like vim).

As for readability there is an argument to be had in specific contexts, but 9 out of 10 times it makes more sense to use a proper word.

Example:

let list = [1, 2, 3];
for i in list {
    println!("{}", i);
}

In this case using item in the place of i would be more fitting.