United Kingdom

4134 readers

110 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore

374

SUVs emit more climate damaging gas than older cars do, study finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The increasing popularity of ultra-heavy SUVs in England means a conventional-engined car bought in 2013 will, on average, have lower carbon emissions than one bought new today, new research has found.

The study by the climate campaign group Possible said there was a strong correlation between income and owning a large SUV, which meant there was a sound argument for “polluter pays” taxes for vehicle emissions based on size.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yet another example of the incredibly stupid decisions George Osborne took when equalising VED/Road tax in year 2 onwards.

It used to be that the higher emissions you made the more you paid every year, and while it was never enough, having a single rate of 180 quid for all petrol / diesel cars regardless of size/efficiency was clearly the wrong policy at the time, and this just shows it.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Monumentally stupid, but we've come to expect that from the Tories over 13 years. Glad to see Labour will reverse this decision on day 1 and bring back the policy of higher emitting vehicles pay more taxes.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stand by for the Tories to start claiming that labour is regressively taxing the poor who can't afford to upgrade their SUVs to electric.

[–] OrgunDonor@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Bit late on that, they are already doing it. Claiming that Labour are "anti-motorist" with ULEZ expansion, LTNs the 20mph limit in wales and also delaying the ban on petrol/diesel cars.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago

The US did something similarly stupid. We based our fuel economy standards on the size of the car, and enforced high percentage reductions on smaller cars than larger. A small truck might need a 30% improvement in economy over previous models, while a larger truck can get away with a 20% improvement.

So manufacturers stopped making smaller cars.

Average economy is worse now than 30 years ago, because CAFE standards incentivized much larger vehicles.