this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
332 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There are uses of AI that are proving to be more than black and white. While voice actors, have protested their performances being fed into AI against their will, we are now seeing an example of this being done, with permission, in a very unique case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Im absolutely sure I need GlaDOS (Ellen McLain) to voice my LLM digital assistant including her iconic unending font of bitter sarcasm.

It's just common sense. No rational viewer would challenge this necessity.

No, McLain is not dead, but I expect she is busy.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Should McLain get paid for it? Should McLain get a say in how her voice is used? That is the real issue with this stuff. The answers are not clear cut.

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and yes imo. A person's voice is part of their likeness, and people should get to decide how their likeness is used and get paid for such usage.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's a bigger challenge for you: Should Humphrey Bogart's voice, likeness and mannerisms be public domain or controlled by his kin as part of his legacy? Do we have to wait as long as Disney forces us to for other IP materials?

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

That is a trickier question. My gut feeling is that while it makes sense for a person's likeness to enter the public domain after they die, it feels a bit morbid and disrespectful for it to become possible to start running AI generated ads of a celebrity the day that they die. I hate how long copyright lasts now, but I feel like there should be at least some period after someone dies before their likeness enters the public domain. I don't know how long that should be, but definitely shorter than copyright currently is (which should also be much shorter).

My other concern is that if studios can freely recreate dead celebrities then new talent won't get a chance to make a name for themselves. Hollywood would much rather milk existing celebrities for every cent possible with AI (which is part of the reason for the SAG/AFTRA strike I guess). I don't have an answer for this right now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)