this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
29 points (93.9% liked)

Australia

3523 readers
84 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not another toothless advisory panel.

It would've been a constitutionally supported advisory, with demonstrated will of the Australian people. That wouldn't be so easily ignored.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It literally would be another toothless advisory panel because it was not going to have any power. Being constitutionally supported just means it has to exist in some unspecified form. There was no “demonstrated will of the Australian people” in it.

You know what does have the demonstrated will of the Australian people? That the proposed voice was a bad idea. That shouldn’t be ignored.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

Come on mate, obviously there would have been demonstrated will if the referendum was upheld.