this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
29 points (93.9% liked)

Australia

3605 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And with how vague the voice constitutional change was, it would be able to be dismantled in every meaningful way another 11 times in the future. It would just have to exist, but it could have been comprised of a 19 year old white intern who supported anti-indigenous things.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Says the person saying how frequently they’re disbanded 😂. You’re literally arguing against yourself.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is a clear political difference between abolishing a body that has been purely legislated versus one that Australians have directly voted in favour of establishing through a referendum.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t say it would be abolished

You literally just quoted me with regards to this as part of your argument. Stop shifting the goalposts.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Read my post again. I didn’t say it would be abolished, I said it would be essentially dismantled since it would be reduced to nothing.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Says the person saying how frequently they’re disbanded

??????????