this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
19 points (80.6% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4688 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I didn't know, so I looked it up. Now I know. Thought you might like to know too, if you don't already. 🙂

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The whole generation thing is just astrology for marketing departments. Xennials use to get called Gen Y, there was no overlap with Gen X and Generation Jones didn’t exist.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, I think it's worse than that. The generational definitions serve as yet another way to divide people against each other. They provide convenient groups that can be blamed for whatever someone is angry about in the world. It's racism for people who are too self-aware to actively support racism.

[–] StringTheory@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

The old “divide and conquer” works remarkably well.

Keep the poor fighting each other, so they don’t start toppling the extremely wealthy and powerful who are feeding off them.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay boomer.

Edit in case it's not blatantly obvious "/s"

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's are cultural difference between those born between 1965-1970 and the rest of Gen-X. I liked a comment posted on Reddit that said that the border between one side of Gen-X and the other was marked by bicycle seats. Banana on one side and BMX on the other.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an older Gen-X, I get that. Outside of generation labeling being too generic, like astrology as mentioned, the problem is that it focuses on the birth date and not the times of childhood. Older Gen-X grew up in the 70s with its particular influences and teen years in the 80s while the other side saw more late 80s-90s while being a kid. Same "generation", but totally different take on things. And likewise can be done for any of the others. And the label "millennial" is now so broad it doesn't even apply to the original group, as it's used as a negative towards teens now when the actual millennials are 30s and parents and potential grandparents already.

It's a classification that worked once because of hard dividing lines, but now is blurred and overmarketed.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Im in the rest of category but I experienced and loved the banana seat.

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe so. Am not saying I agree with or endorse this terminology.

Just that I want to know what people are meant when these terms are used. And they are used a lot.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, Gen Y was Millennials. The Xennial overlap is just acknowledging a small cohort with a very specific experience.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Not really. People's formative experiences do have a big impact on their world view. The generations are broken up into groups that experienced very different things as they were coming of age.