this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
148 points (92.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40337 readers
582 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've always hated the idea of using a subscription/cloud hosting for password management. I feel like I should have a LOT more control over that stuff and I don't really want to hand all my keys over to a company.

All my secrets have been going in a highly encrypted archive with a long passphrase, but obviously that isn't convenient on all devices. It's been fine, I can open it on any computer but it's not super quick. It does have the advantage of being able to put in multiple files, notes, private keys but it's not ideal.

Anyway, finally found something that isn't subscription, and has a similar philosophy - a highly encrypted archive file, and it's open source and has heaps of clients including web browser plugins so it's usable anywhere, and you can sync the vault with any file sync you like.

Thought you guys might appreciate the find, password managers have always been a bit of a catch 22 for me.

Note for android i found keepassxc the best app, and i'm using KeePassHelper browser plugin, and the KeePassXc desktop app as well as the free official one. Apps all seem to be cross platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I have both set up right now.

Things I like better about KeePass:

KeePass doesn't use the cloud, you don't have to worry about the server getting compromised or going down because there's nothing public-facing to hack. You always know where your password database is.

KeePass lets you encrypt the database with not only the master password but also using the challenge-response from a YubiKey. That means every time you save your DB the encryption key is rotated and the DB is actually encrypted by two authentication factors.

While both can add custom fields to an entry, I like that KeePass has the option to set fields as protected so their contents are hidden like the passwords.

Things I like better about VaultWarden:

Convenience.

You can log in to your VaultWarden account on any device from the browser. KeePass requires some software to access the DB.

The VaultWarden companion software is just better. It just does autofill better. KeePassXC/DX work well but just not as well as the BitWarden software.

Other thoughts:

Syncing passwords between devices with KeePass requires 3rd party software like SyncThing. If you break/lose/etc your VaultWarden server you could lose all your passwords with it.

Always make/test backups.

[–] zeluko@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I like that KeePass has the option to set fields as protected

Vaultwarden can do that, though its quite stiff in some aspects like folders.. subfolders? nonexistant..

Folder/subfolders work just fine... when you make folder 'a'... you can add subfolder b by typing 'a/b'

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I couldn't find that option.

I can add custom fields to an entry but I can't designate them as "protected"

Of course I also thought at first that you couldn't attach files but I guess you can, they just didn't seem to transfer over from my KeePass DB

[–] zeluko@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The interface is weird and unintuitive at times..
I have a dropdown menu at the button "New custom field" and can select "Hidden".

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Oooh thank you!

Can't believe I missed that

[–] gentoo_biscuit@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

I'm on Bitwarden right now and have been thinking of switching to KeePass. My issue keeping me from actually switching is the convenience factor. Can't imagine making it even more annoying to use for my SO

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have keepass on a USB drive, an exe version that doesn't require install, along with your db.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sure can.

But that's not perfect.
Often businesses will lock down their computers to prevent unauthorized software from running at all, not just installing.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And not lock down random external sites they see a user visiting every day that aren't related to their work functions? Sounds like the SOC needs to get better at their monitoring.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

In my experience, locking down non-work sites is much less common than locking down USB devices and unknown executables. USB devices and random executables are more of a security risk as a USB drive can be used to exfiltrate data very quickly while an executable could contain ransomware, other malware, keyloggers, etc. Sites are sandboxed and limited in terms of what they can do.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Like the other commenter said, typically websites are less locked down.

It's simpler to sandbox the browser and prevent unauthorized software from running than to block out most of the Internet and deal with complaints all day about the web restrictions

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I use a yubikey on bitwarden (vaultwarden) just fine...
Custom protected fields exist.
And you can always hide it in a vpn.

A big problem with keepass is if two updates to passwords try to sync simultaneously... sync- thing/ other synching software can't merge only the updates in each file.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I also use aYubiKey in VaultWarden but the key is not used to generate the encryption keys, only the master password is, so you don't get that added security and benefit of the encryption keys rotating every time you save the DB.