this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1208 points (90.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5743 readers
2261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Treating the constitution as if it cant be changed because it is "perfect" is wildly different than not wanting the government to boundary test how it can skirt the constitution to get what it wants. When the US government doesnt follow the rules that it was supposed to be bound to via the constitution, it is almost never a good thing.

The constitution set rules for how to change it legitimately. It was designed to be changed over time not flagrently ignored.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the problem, it cannot be changed anymore, the base problems with the system itself prevents it from doing so.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you have an issue with these "base problems", not the Constitution itself

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who are you and why does it benefit you to support this narrative worshipping of the constitution? Because every response you've made in this thread is either trying to support the constitution as infallible or mock anyone making arguments against it.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of you idiots understand how the US government actually works and it annoys me.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't seen you make any attempt to prove you know otherwise. You just seem like an idiot debasing other people's arguments rather than making any arguments of your own.

Hell the very post I was responding to you didn't even make an argument, just tried to argue the person wasn't talking about the constitution, when it would obviously be part of the base as a foundation of the country.

If it annoys you and you can't actually provide anything, you should just leave. If you can provide something, then don't waste people's time.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've said multiple times

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land

The Constitution can be changed, and we have done so multiple times

These are the core things that it annoys me people don't understand.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

100%. The only people that are gungho to overhaul the constitution at this point in time mean to do it irreparable harm. It's a tough thing to navigate when you don't believe the politicians involved have anything but the public's unquestioning obedience in mind.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

The constitution was designed to be vaguely descriptive, so that in the case that society does change, then statements can be interpreted in a way that supports the new view of the modern country.

For instance, while not in the constitution, the government set up no offical state language or religion, in the case that society had changed making what they said redundant.