this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1075 points (86.2% liked)

Memes

45718 readers
1242 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doofer_name@feddit.de 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hate point 2 and 3.

I have an avarage travel of 45-55 minutes from my home city to the city I work in. By car and by train, while the train is usually on the slower end. It takes about 20-30 minutes to get from my home to the train station by taking the bus or riding the bike. When taking the bus I also have to factor in about 15 minutes between arrival at the station and departure of the train. Then there is another 20 minutes from the train station at destination to my place of work. So it takes me 40-65 minutes longer taking the train… twice a day, making it 1:20-2:10h a day (when Im lucky bc trains over here have frequent delays). One hour ish doesn’t sound like much? Well you’ll feel it if you working 11-12h a shift or a 9-10 hour a day in a normal 9 to 5 job (starting work at around 7 a.m.).

Then there is a neat little think called night or late shifts. There is no way I’m gonna take the train here. They either take an hour longer or the bus at my home city does not drive anymore on the way back.

Demand better public transportation. Demand functioning trains and frequent bus and tram connections. But do not tell people that need to take the car for whatever reason, that they should just take the worse option and make them feel like the problem.

I hate cars. I hate driving. And I love taking the train or taking the bike within my city. But sometimes I just have to take the car. That is not my fault tho, since public transportation is not the main focus of politics over here. And thats what needs to change globally.

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

When I switched from using the bus to going by bike, i cut my commute time by more than half. If I were to take the car, it would halve again. Public transport is great, and necessary. But it will never be faster than a personal car for anything but large distances.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

... where you live. Where I live (in central Europe) we have a subway every 2-3 minutes and you're at worst 2 blocks away from a stop. It all depends on the infrastructure. A subway cant be stuck in traffic...

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. Here in Berlin traveling to my old office (when I didn't work from home all the time) with the S or U-bahn took 30-35 minutes and by car/taxi about 40-45 minutes due to the traffic.

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Berlin is one of the few german cities where public transport is done right. In cologne, where I lived, there are a lot of stops, but the inferstructure is just realy bad. They managed that trains get stuck in traffic too sometimes. And for some reason they trains only arrive in a 10-30min time window. So if you want to follow one line it's relatively fine, but if you have to change trains you have to be lucky. In the city center still faster than driving though.

[–] IkarusHagen2@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just say central european city.

I too live in central europe and the bus line i could take from my town to the town i work in takes 1 hr to get there and back, at the end of my day the bus only departes one hour after i'm finished with work so i have to wait for the bus the same amount of time i need for both ways with my car.

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They should really say a European city with a subway. Not all cities in Europe have a subway.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

It was pretty obvious from my comment that I live in a European city with a subway...

I didnt say my comment applied to all European cities either.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, trams/streetcars in Zurich have right of way and the red lights change for them. Which is completely logical considering how many more people you can fit in them than a few cards at a red light. The problems with public transit in North America are a function of our car infrastructure.

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

If I rode my bike to work, my shift would be over by the time I got there. I'm really starting to like the idea of biking to work.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nearly every city on the planet with a subway system disputes your bullshit.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sure is nice that everyone gets to live in New York, London, and Washington.

A better solution is to reduce how much people need to travel. Instead of building trillion-dollartransit systems so people can to to the office we should be taxing the everloving shit out of office spaces for jobs that can be worked remotely.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not both? I live in Stockholm and work from home. I have amazing trains that I could take to work, and I've never had a commute longer than 40 minutes. But a 0 minute commute is still shorter than 5minute commute.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because not everyone can live in fucking Stockholm.

An apartment within 40 miles of my office in the city costs 5x as much per month as where I live. I can't get a fucking pizza delivered to my house, much less a bus. And unless I want to smell like a gym at work the 5+ months a year it's over 100° outside, I need to drive to the nearest bus station if I want to take transit. So I'm already having to drive and park somewhere. Then I have to pay to park at the bus station and pay again to ride the bus that drops me off 9 blocks from my office, where I'd have to walk the rest of the way.

All told it'd add 2-3 hours to my commute and be more expensive than driving.

But if 100% of the work I do is on the computer at the office. The real solution is to not have the fucking office at all.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are obviously other systemic problems. Cities being designed around cars isn’t the only one.

But your rage shouldn’t be directed at the people who want to make public transit options suck less.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His solution isn't to make it suck less. His just says how great it is to live somewhere that was designed around walking because when the city was established that was pretty much the only option.

The Southern US is designed around cars because until fairly recently it was very sparsely populated, so everything had to be designed around cars and air conditioning in order to develop. It was the correct decision at the time, and changing it now is much more difficult than simply saying "be like this city that was established before the steam engine."

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh I feel you. I’ve spent a decent amount of time in the southern US. Lots of wide open spaces and cities built on massive scales.

There won’t be any immediate fixes for these places. But there are steps that can be taken. And plenty of cities that are more densely populated, even in the north, Midwest, and west coast are just as terribly designed. Those are what infuriate me most. Los Angeles just makes me mad. It’s a giant concrete jungle full of absolutely necessary cars and it doesn’t need to be that way. 1 in 35 Americans live in LA County and yet it’s one of the worst cities in terms of public transit.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah that's definitely a challenge, and I believe it is a failure of city planning.

My condo is worth $300k and is within 15min of central Stockholm. The housing crisis is definitely a problem around the world, but European cities that don't have the missing middle problem are in a much better place.

Back on topic, even if you could work from home, it would still take you over an hour to go grocery shopping or buy a pizza, which is a huge problem. Both of those things are within a 15 min walk for me.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I'm in Vancouver, while the system needs some improvement, the skytrain gets me right to the airport, with trains every few minutes. No parking nonsense. Driving, with traffic, is much longer. Bussing has some express routes so the trips aren't so many stops also. until the system wxpands develooment the consideration is looking for a place nearer a stop or station.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

A bike is faster in my city if you are decently fast, but a bus or trolley is faster than cars during rush hours, because we have public transit lanes, so while everyone in their tin cans is stressed yelling at the dumbass who just cut them off im breezing past, listening to a podcast, meditating or catching a quick ten minute nap before work.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I tried taking my family out on a weekend on transit. 40 minutes wait for a bus that had any room, an hour to travel 10km, and it cost us $10 each way for the family. I live in a major city but our transit is trash. It's not fit for a city of this size.

[–] doofer_name@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That sounds horrible. Public transportation is such a vital thing for citys to function properly as a place to live and not just work in. And dont get me started on small towns or the countryside where not owning a car basically means you’re fucked. I cannot wrap my head around how politicians just fail to see this. Climate change might be the most urgent, but by far not the only argument for better public transportation.

[–] ahto@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not fit for a city of this size.

Tokyo would like to have a word with you. It's not public transit in and of itself that is the issue, it's the implementation.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you read that wrong. They aren't saying public transit doesn't work in a city that size, but the public transit in their city isn't up to the standard it should be for a city that size.

[–] ahto@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, I see it now. My bad!

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How likely is it that your home and work are 20 minutes away from train stations because your region prioritizes cars?

[–] doofer_name@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Its not just likely, thats the case. But living in the inner city is expensive here. And thats the case in most of the country.