this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
65 points (95.8% liked)
CSCareerQuestions
947 readers
1 users here now
A community to ask questions about the tech industry!
Rules/Guidelines
- Follow the programming.dev site rules
- Please only post questions here, not articles to avoid the discussion being about the article instead of the question
Related Communities
- !programming@programming.dev - a general programming community
- !no_stupid_questions@programming.dev - general question community
- !ask_experienced_devs@programming.dev - for questions targeted towards experienced developers
Credits
Icon base by Skoll under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A couple thoughts for you:
Looking at your experience, it looks good.
As a hiring manager, I would ask you what was different about the job you stayed at for 7 years, vs the many that are less than 18 months.
It's not a deal breaker, but you do have very few tenures that even reach two years.
As a manager, it takes me up to two years to get a staff member to the point of being really valuable to my organization.
I don't have any problem with a large number of short tenures.
But when a resume has mostly tenures under two years, I need to discuss with the candidate whether there's a way I can make a longer stretch of employment (with my team) work for them.
I would expect your resume to land you conversations, so I would encourage you to be prepared to talk about that point. Doesn't need to be a big deal, but some managers are going to want to discuss it.
This is an interesting and unexpected take on the near future market. Nice to hear somebody thinks it may start warming up again that soon.