this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
255 points (97.8% liked)

Games

16752 readers
749 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
255
Unity’s CEO is out, but that still may not be enough for developers (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's a start, JR being out. But yeah, a new board, and new leadership that actually came from within Unity / the game dev community is needed for devs to have any return to faith in Unity.

I nominate Keijiro Takahashi as the interim CEO. I don't think there are many who understand unity at a 1:1 mindmeld level like that. Set a new set of goals, get LTS into actual LTS shape, unify the pipelines, restore confidence, save the princess, drive the darkness from the lands and forge a path to profitability that doesn't alienate unity's most valuable asset, the community.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like most people I'm perfectly fine with pain for Unity. I'm fine if they want to raise the price, what I don't understand is why they didn't do that and instead went this weird route that they can't possibly have thought would actually work.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, it's not like we're unaware they've been unprofitable the entire time and cheap debt isn't a thing anymore. The underhanded nature of backward-changing the TOS and acting like per-install charging wasn't a borked concept from the start are what did it for me. I will never give them my trust much less business until there's a change in leadership across the board.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are only unprofitable because they kept spending the money they already had in order to buy other businesses.

But they make an absolute fortune they just seem to have really high outgoings as well.

So they could become profitable by just sorting out their finances there was no need to raise prices.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah I keep waiting for some brilliant game-ready tech to come out of one of those acquisitions like Weta and.... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's interesting that they didn't buy the one company that would actually make sense for them to purchase. Quixel or Reality Capture

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Right? Unreal's microsplat tech is going to boggle minds, unity needs an asset library to rival.