this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
435 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2862 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edited title to match articles title.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt Israel could just invade and conquer Iran like that. Having superior equipment is one thing, but actually invading a place will inspire a population to fight against you more than almost anything else, and Iran is a mountainous country that has a population close to 10 times that of Israel. Actually occupying and holding a country like that for any length of time would be a nightmare even for a power like the United States (consider how Afghanistan ended), let alone Israel. They could maybe win a conventional engagement with their superior equipment, sure, and they could do tremendous damage to Iranian infrastructure with bombs or even nukes if they really wanted, but thats not the same as conquering a place.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They wouldn't need to hold it. Iran is already primed for revolution. Just create the power vacuum.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Foreign invasion tends to cause people to rally around their government, or at least put internal conflicts on the backburner, historically, I'd imagine such a strategy would stand a serious chance of actually preventing any revolution that might otherwise take place.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see the younger generation of Iran, which was brutally put down over the Hijab protests, coalescing behind their terrorist government.

[–] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

You really seem to know nothing about the geopolitics of the region. Iranians were put in that position when the regime was much weaker, and everyone united against the invader. Iranians are not likely to welcome anyone who tries to invade as an invasion inevitably massacres civilians, and foreigners killing Iranian civilians won't be popular with you know, Iranian civilians.