this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
11 points (78.9% liked)
Buildapc
3788 readers
5 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If I'm not going to be getting the full performance of that card, should I consider buying an older card instead, if the older card would be just as fast in practice?
(How can I know the effective performance of a video card on my system?)
I have a PC of theseus. My CPU and GPU get swapped out on alternating 3-5 year intervals. I buy the best GPU I can afford KNOWING that in a few years I'm going to be upgrading my CPU. My computer is an eternal bottleneck.
If you just plan on keeping everything as is for as long as possible then getting a less powerful GPU would hurt you at all. It would save you some cash.
No, don't listen to those who're so scared of being Bottlenecked™. Unless your upgrade is hilariously lopsided (like buying a RTX 4090 for an Intel Sandy Bridge platform), it's likely to be the best upgrade per dollar spent.
Do think about your upgrade path in the future, like, are you planning on an entirely new PC soon? The other factor in an upgrade is also the dollar per time value; no point spending $200+ when you're getting a new PC next year, for example.
I went with a GTX 1070 for an i7 920, that extended that platform for another 3.5 years. Played quite a few games too. Carried the GPU into the new system for another 2 years! Pascal was truly an amazing generation.
No you really should get the best GPU you can afford. Yes you will be bottlenecked, but only on more recent games where game devs are really trying to squeeze what they can out of the latest Xbox and PS5.
CPU upgrades are relatively cheap compared to GPU upgrades as well.