this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
334 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know we're living in the crapsack timeline, but I didn't realize it was a crapsack made of little shit people that the Republicans sculpted like they were Play-Doh and then threw them in the sack and made screaming noises, pretending the little shit people were screaming, before declaring that sack to be their new second-in-command after Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 139 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They put a far right super majority in the supreme court, are trying to put their candidate in Congress as speaker and then re-elect him to the executive branch.

We all know they're fucking Nazis, but, just saying, this sure seems like some 1930's Germany shit, right now. Like it's obvious and all, but still needs to be said out loud.

Would be a lot cooler if we were not trying to replicate that shit.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If elected speaker, he would be third in line to the presidency. They were already ready to kill Trump's own VP on his behalf.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On the bright side, he can't claim executive immunity or pardon himself if he was selected to be Speaker, since the legislative branch does not confer the same level of such protections, and he wouldn't be able to campaign as much, since he would have to do actual work.

On top of that, he would have a much smaller megaphone, much less power, and he would be a live-in distraction for the true believers in Congress.

Basically, he'd have to successfully assassinate two members of the executive branch who are around and guarded by numerous people at all times.

[–] Zekas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume he wouldn't just golf all the time anyway. Being president obviously posed little hindrance.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I like the cut of your jib, but I don't think Speaker offers the same...erm..."flexibility" as the presidency.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Basically, he’d have to successfully assassinate two members of the executive branch who are around and guarded by numerous people at all times.

Or just manage to impeach them successfully. Which is unlikely, but possible.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah.. but A LOT of those guys are now in prison too.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even close to enough to make a difference if this happens. For every convicted J6 insurrectionist, there's 100 willing to act that just didn't make it down to Washington that day.

[–] theragu40@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Willing to bet that number is a lot higher than 100, sadly.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He won't become speaker he got to many legal problems and it takes away from him campaigning so we safe for now.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's why it'd be so funny if he got huckleberry finn'd into the job

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't he turn it down even if he gets the votes? Unless he knows something we don't know and MTG and pals have a plan to get him installed as president this way.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Installing the Speaker as President just requires removing Pres and VP. It's 3rd in line.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Like he did with the presidency?

He's using his legal problems as part of his campaigning tactic.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Becoming speaker makes him 3rd in line for the presidency and that sweet, sweet executive immunity. 4 more years before he could be prosecuted, and let's be fair it's about even odds he'd live that long.