this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
369 points (88.8% liked)

Socialist Rifle Association

723 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm confused is this saying that LGBTQ people should arm themselves to protect themselves or is it saying that guns have the right to exist?

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's about the right to get bent

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

But “get bent” refers to sodomy, in a typically derogatory context. It’s like saying “this sucks dick” to mean, “this is bad” (read: people who suck dick = less than). It’s the same as people saying, “this is gay” to mean bad. So really, we should be phasing out the phrase “get bent.”

[–] trafguy@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

This reads to me as "I am not debating my right to exist [as a trans person or trans supporter]. I'm ready to defend myself and my allies if need be, to whatever extent is necessary. Back off or else."

So it comes across as a call to be ready to fight back, which would mean that if you're comfortable owning a gun or another weapon (or more comfortable owning a gun than not within the context of the current sociopolitical climate), it would be wise to have one on hand. I don't take it as a literal call to arms, it's more like an alternate, more direct/specific take on the Gadsden Flag. Not overtly hostile, but a clear warning that aggression will be responded to with an appropriate measure of self defense.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It can be both.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the lower right half makes it ambiguous. Is that a response to the top text, or a continuation of the sentiment?