this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
113 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
336 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Critics say under the new proposal schools and other sites that have solar and more than one electricity meter would be required to sell the energy they produce back to their utility and then buy it back at a much higher rate.

What the heck CA?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Crap like this is just going to make sites with solar buy backup batteries. And then they’ll never send the energy back to the grid (and electric bills will go up even more).

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

My thoughts exactly. "lmao fuck off then" cuts power lines to the public grid :D

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meaningful solar backups for residential applications cost about the same as the actual panels.

These are meaningful capital expenses and talking about double the cost just to avoid these rate gimmicks is not realistic. The utilities need to fix their transmission issues and the state needs to stop the perverse incentives that they've structured the utilities with.