this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023

103 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19512 readers

452 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

103

cache (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago by sisyphean@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could implement in-closet indexing instead to make the cache misses hurt less, trading off some extra insertion time but needing less memory for the cache which is much more expensive cost wise. At this point you're storing almost your whole DB in the cache and your room's a mess.