I might be mistaken, but by that quote and given that every motorway has three lanes in each direction, or at least two I assume in the USA, the cost of the road is at least comparable and at most a bit dearer. I'd even say it constitutes fudging the numbers to pull the wool over.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only if you compare 3 roads to 1 track. If you're arguing about which costs more then it doesn't make sense to include the cost of the whole 3 lanes as all that traffic doesn't need to go by rail.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Well, the difference is that three lanes of traffic have about the same capacity for passengers as a single railway track, no?