this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
517 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59454 readers
4277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A partnership with OpenAI will let podcasters replicate their voices to automatically create foreign-language versions of their shows.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (20 children)

That's just weird... Part of the reason I listen to podcasts is that I just enjoy people talking about things and AI voices still have this uncanny quality to me

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It won't take long until that uncanny quality is worked out.

[–] Pantoffel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Following up on the other comment.

The issue is that widely available speech models are not yet offering the quality that is technically possible. That is probably why you think we're not there yet. But we are.

Oh, I'm looking forward to just translate a whole audiobook into my native language and any speaking style I like.

Okay, perhaps we would still have difficulties with made up fantasy words or words from foreign languages with little training data.

Mind, this is already possible. It's just that I don't have access to this technology. I sincerely hope that there will be no gatekeeping to the training data, such that we can train such models ourselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)