this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
317 points (95.9% liked)

Work Reform

9966 readers
19 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In an extraordinary show of support for organized labor, President Biden said he would join workers in Michigan on the front lines of their strike against leading automakers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well why didn't you do that for the train workers, asshole??

[–] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly my question. God forbid they actually have sick days.

[–] BasicTraveler@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

When Joe Biden and Congress enacted legislation in December that blocked a threatened freight rail strike, many workers angrily faulted Biden for not ensuring that the legislation also guaranteed paid sick days. But since then, union officials says, members of the Biden administration, including the transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, and labor secretary, Marty Walsh, who stepped down on 11 March, lobbied the railroads, telling them it was wrong not to grant paid sick days.

“We’ve made a lot of progress,” said Greg Regan, president of the Transportation Trades Department of the AFL-CIO, the main US labor federation. “This is being done the right way. Each railroad is negotiating with each of its individual unions on this.”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buden got the railworkers their demands. The media just never covered it.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but he shouldn't have shut down the negotiations in the first place.

  1. It's bad optics for him. He would have known perfectly well which action would be covered by the media, and which one wouldn't be, and how that would look. It ends up looking like a strategic choice to appear anti-union.
  2. It weakens the railworkers union! Now they know they can't get their demands on their own, they literally have to have federal intervention. Their bosses also know this. Biden also knew this.
[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I honestly agree. We need strong Unions and forcing them back to work sucks. But without the trains running, America's economic infrastructure would collapse pretty quickly. Then everyone would be blaming Biden for that.

It was a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.