this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
405 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luciole@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago (27 children)

The strongest argument against AI art is that it is derivative of the copyrighted art it is based on. A photo of a copyrighted artwork would be similarly difficult to copyright. In this sense, AI art is more akin to music sampling in that it uses original material to make something new -- and to sample music you must ask permission.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] master5o1@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that a picture of a straw man?

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's characters from a popular TV show as knitted figures.

load more comments (24 replies)