Gaming

14 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

Wait, is Unity allowed to just change its fee structure like that? (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by wave_walnut@kbin.social to c/gaming@kbin.social

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Confusing, contradictory terms of service clauses leave potential opening for lawsuits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] spriteblood@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is still up on their FAQ:

Yes, the fee applies to eligible games currently in market that continue to distribute the runtime. We look at a game's lifetime installs to determine eligibility for the runtime fee. Then we bill the runtime fee based on all new installs that occur after January 1, 2024.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I love that their "proprietary" method of determining installs is to just look at the # of installs reported publicly by Google and Apple app stores.