this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
332 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
3076 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 38 points 1 year ago (13 children)

This actually perfectly demonstrates the problem with calling women "females".

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

No, it demonstrates people's inability to formulate sentences properly. The 2nd person is asking clarifying questions to be sure they understand them properly..as one should.

The only thing wrong with saying female, is in your head.

How would you say female humans when referring to a group of female humans.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I have literally no way of determining if a person is female outside a hospital setting. But there are certain characteristics that people can adopt to signify themselves as women.

So, asking how I'd refer to a group of female humans is kind of a false question outside a niche situation, or unless I'm a doctor...

But, all this is avoided by just saying "women". Or, in the provided example, just saying "dog", or placing "husky" after "female".

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Not me, but I'm flattered by the comparison

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)