this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1223 points (88.3% liked)

Comic Strips

12638 readers
4430 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Punch Nazis is a good start.

And by that I mean be socially intolerant of intolerance. Personal morals and actions don't need to and shouldn't be held to the same standard as the US Federal government.

[–] nybble41@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Individuals do have more freedom to discriminate and show "social intolerance", but that obviously doesn't extend to punching people they disagree with. Or violent responses in general.

[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not morally obligated to debate someone arguing in favor of genocide, for instance. Is it legally assault to punch them, sure. Would I want the government to come in and boot stomp them, probably not. Is punching them morally wrong, nope.

[–] nybble41@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The morals of your actions are for you to decide. It's your conscience. However, if you punched someone over what they said they would be perfectly justified both in defending themselves against your aggression and in punching you right back. At that point you would have no objective rational argument that their defense or retribution was wrong which would not similarly condemn your own actions. You're the one who chose to escalate to violence, not them.

At least then they're busy fighting me and not furthering the cause of horrific systematic injustices against those that can't defend themselves.