politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Easy solution: All elections in the state after the supreme Court decision need to be invalid and on hold until the new redistricting is approved.
Don't get it done by the next election? Sorry, your ballots and electrics don't count.
It's disenfranchisement, but for everyone, not just the ones whose gerrymandering selected.
Letting the people who refuse to give up power, STAY in power is not a solution.
The president had to send in the national guard to enforce the ruling with the school decision with Gov. Wallace.
Nope!
Wisconsin GOP currently has a super majority because of these maps. They'd happily keep their seats until they die using your easy solution.
No you see they would also have to lose their seats and the court appoints a board to set new maps and hold a new election. Everybody who participated in blocking compliance with the court decision is prohibited from candidacy or any other position as a gov official.
Nope. You hold every politician in the state of Alabama in contempt, issue warrants, arrest them then force them to meet and redraw the maps in jail till they meet the requirements of the court decision.
Sounds good at least.
Why don’t we just use county lines for representation until maps are drawn. It’s predetermined and while counties do typically lean politically, they’re not developed around political lines. That way we don’t halt all progress until a map is redrawn. Delaying the redrawing is a strategy on its own so take away the benefits of delay
Districts need to have equal population, counties don't have that quality and thus won't work.