this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
487 points (92.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2108 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maporita@unilem.org 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The key to getting progression policies passed is voting for Congress. Having a democratic President, whether it's Biden or someone else, doesn't matter if we only have a razor-thin majority. We just get held hostage by people like Manchin. We need solid majorities in both House and Senate to achieve anything.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not even needed to be honest. Blue states need to swing their dick around and demand shit, but blue state politicians aren't doing anything. I know this isn't the most palatable comparison, but slave states, leading up to the Civil War, swung their dick around and got concession after concession from free state politicians even if they didn't have nearly enough votes to get legislation they wanted and could have been shut out by simple majorities. Blue states and blue state politicians really need to get some fucking cojones or the US is heading down a path it's never going to come back from.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I know this isn't the most palatable comparison, but slave states, leading up to the Civil War, swung their dick around and got concession after concession from free state politicians even if they didn't have nearly enough votes to get legislation they wanted and could have been shut out by simple majorities

This is literally what MAGA politicians are doing right now. I've said it before, but it's humiliating watching the Democratic Party losing "the game" by insisting on playing by the rules when the opposing team is openly bragging about cheating.

[–] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

the key to getting progressive policies passed is direct pressure. widespread strikes and organizing.

[–] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

dems had a majority when obama was elected and did nothing with it

[–] maporita@unilem.org 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They only had a majority in both houses for 2 years and still managed to get the ACA passed which was pretty significant. Even Trump couldn't undo it. Also in fairness to Obama he was focused on staving off financial collapse for a good part of his first term.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They only had a filibuster proof majority for a few months actually.

im not impressed with them passing a conservative healthcare plan from the 90s that is basically just free money for healthcare companies and still leaves millions of americans without healthcare. the dems didnt even stave off financial collapse they bailed out huge banks and other corporations while doing absolutely nothing for the american people

[–] thoro@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The ACA was a Heritage Foundation health care plan that acts as a de facto subsidy for private health insurance. The best we ever get is still conservative.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

California has a bullet proof super majority and they can't provide a livable wage, affordable housing, universal healthcare which includes dental and mental healthcare, or address homelessness other than hiding them from view. If a state like that can't provide, why should be trust it to happen at the federal level? Dems could hold everything but 1% of Congress and they would blame that 1% for everything they didn't do

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I live in CA. Our homeless people have Medi-Cal, which includes dental, vision, and mental care. We have a zoning issue that the NIMBYs aren't budging on, though I think I have found a workaround involving right of first refusal. Once we fix the zoning issue, our housing costs will come down dramatically.

Also, remember we only "own" about 1/3 of the land out here. Most of the state is Federal land operated by the BLM

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

K I'll go tell the tent cities that everything is actually going really well for them lol.

Private healthcare loves the ACA + Medi-Cal cause it keeps their costs high and guarantees tax dollars can pay it. These companies often sell off their debt for fractions of it's value cause they know they're not going to get it all back, and they only need a small percentage to turn a ridiculous profit. This is the system these tax scheme substitutes for public healthcare help maintain.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Dude, compare California to a non Democratic majority state, not to the perfect utopia you want.

Of course California has problems. If they solved those problems, there would be other problems.

But California has massively fewer problems due to the untouchable Democratic supermajority in the state.

Parts of California even have ranked choice voting.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The major difference between the federal government and state governments is the fact that the federal government is the source of all money. They can spend it into existence. California cannot.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of the things that would improve the quality of peoples lives better would cost the state a dime. Requiring businesses to pay a livable wage will increase state revenues and a stronger economy. Requiring universal healthcare would increase productivity and provide preventative care which lowers costs to the state, employers, and employees.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seemed that your original comment boiled down to, if a state can't do something, how can the federal government possibly do it, and I gave a major reason why. Also, healthcare isn't free unfortunately, and since it cannot be tied to employment, it would have to come from the government.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it would have to come from the government

The government can regulate coverage and medicine. The core infrastructure is already in place through Medicare and Medicaid in every state.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, the money for those programs come from the government. Thank you for agreeing with me.

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proof positive of failed democratic policy. Do you need more examples in other states?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Texas, Kentucky, Alabama, and all other red states are shit too.