this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
774 points (98.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3513 readers
57 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was ITAR restricted and not sensitive. Every time I see this I just shake my head..

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I thought. It's been 8+ years since I had to do anything ITAR so I couldn't remember if it also applied to information. From what I remember it explicitly controls products that are purpose built or components of defense systems (and by that I mean 'Arms').

While I'm sure Warthunder thought the best idea was to say "fuck that, we aren't touching this live wire with a 20 foot long insulated fiber glass pole" and the manual itself is export controlled (as it aids in use of the F-117 system) there isn't a new national security threat because of it being shared publicly. Part of the reason ITAR exists, if you make it difficult or impossible to obtain all the parts of a system, that system is going to have a hard time working correctly.

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

NATO sells the docs online lmao